Hi everyone,
The other day I was reading a book about relationships, and in it the author quoted another author who had written that people unconsciously choose romantic partners who have a better immune system than they. Though the author of the book I was reading eventually refuted this statement later on, once I read that quote, I looked up from my book, laughed, and looked at the wall. Flabbergasted, I spent a few moments digesting what I had just read.
And then my laughter turned into tears.
Because the reality is that my immune system isn't so great, therefore, according to the author, I am virtually undesirable.
Is this true? Hell no. Because I have hope in the God who redeems, who heals, who doesn't let illness overcome His children.
Yet messages like these are ever so common. I know so because I have worked to refute such messages for a long time now, even before I got Lyme. Like the Lyme bugs hanging out in all corners of my body, these negative messages are sneaky: they work themselves into the tiny, dark crevices of my heart, my mind, my being. I usually don't even realize these negative messages exist until I read statements like above, or someone says something unknowingly hurtful, or when I'm told (explicitly or implicitly) to shut my mouth about the suffering I have experienced.
At this point, I like to remind myself of 1 John 1:5, "This the message we have heard from him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all." This is the message I want to hear everyday. Likewise, this is the message that I want to break into those tiny, dark crevices.
Towards freedom,
A.
21 September 2009
Tiny, Dark Crevices
written by anna studenny at 11:05 AM
topic Grief, Lyme Disease, who is God?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
My first thought was, "think of all the men you can choose from!!" :D
Wendy,
Well, yes, I agree with that too. But on the other hand, who would want me?
The author's logic has some inherent holes. If you choose a healthier person, then your partner is obviously choosing an unhealthier person. The author's logic automatically eliminates half the population.
Of course, we know this, but do we believe it? I would like to think that I'm headed that way.
Thanks for your encouragement!
Anna
Don't dwell on that author's rather woolly logic - at best that could only explain trends at a larger population level. At the person-to-person level, I've seen you at your best and I've seen you on a brain-foggy day, and you definitely have qualities that transcend your CD57 count.
I can't imagine that paucity of mate selection will be a lingering problem for you.
Post a Comment